|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 17-23
Antiepileptic drug usage in neuro-oncology: A practice survey
Amrita Parhi1, Tejpal Gupta2
1 Tata Memorial Centre, Clinical Research Secretariat, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Tata Memorial Centre, Neuro-Oncology Disease Management Group, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Submission||18-Feb-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||17-Mar-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||3-Jun-2019|
Dr. Tejpal Gupta
ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai - 410 210, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Purpose: Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are very commonly prescribed for seizure prophylaxis in patients with brain tumors even without prior history of seizures. We sought to review the current practices of prescribing AEDs among neuro-oncology health-care professionals.
Materials and Methods: An e-mail with online link to a 15-item questionnaire regarding AED prophylaxis was sent to members of major academic societies representing the Indian Neuro-Oncology Community to assess the prevalent patterns of practice.
Results: The online survey was completed by 318 of 3320 health-care professionals that were mailed for an overall response rate of 9.6%. Majority (68.9%) of respondents were radiation oncologists followed by neurosurgeons (22.9%) and medical oncologists/neurologists (8.2%). The practice setting spanned across the health-care spectrum, and over 75% reported having ≥ 5-year of experience in managing patients with brain tumors. Even for seizure-naïve patients, 65.1% of respondents routinely prescribed prophylactic AEDs with significant variability in the duration of such prophylaxis. Levetiracetam was the most preferred AED (60%) followed by phenytoin (35%) in the survey. Most respondents believed that tumor type, histological grade, and anatomic location influenced the risk of seizures. Despite widespread use in clinical practice, only 27.3% of the respondents strongly believed that prophylactic AEDs significantly reduced the risk of seizures. Over 93% of respondents agreed that a large randomized controlled trial would better inform therapeutic decision-making regarding AED prophylaxis.
Conclusions: This survey of the Indian Neuro-Oncology Community demonstrates widespread variability in the frequency and duration of AED prophylaxis in seizure-naive brain tumor patients in contemporary practice.
Keywords: Antiepileptic drugs, brain tumors, prophylaxis, seizures
|How to cite this article:|
Parhi A, Gupta T. Antiepileptic drug usage in neuro-oncology: A practice survey. Int J Neurooncol 2019;2:17-23
| Introduction|| |
Seizures, one of the common symptoms in neuro-oncologic practice,, occur in approximately 20%–45% of patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors and are associated with significant morbidity and negative impact on health-related quality of life., Brain tumor patients who have never experienced a seizure previously also carry a 20%–30% risk of developing new-onset seizures during the evolution of their disease., The occurrence of seizures can precipitate neurological/functional impairment (cerebral edema resulting in raised intracranial pressure) and secondary morbidities (aspiration and brain hypoxia) in the affected patient, as well as cause psychological distress (anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, isolation, and stigmatization) to the patient and caregivers. While it is justified and appropriate to use antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) therapeutically in brain tumor patients with prior history of seizures, there is no high-quality evidence supporting the use of prophylactic AEDs in patients who have never experienced seizures in the past. The duration of AED usage, the need for a uniform tapering schedule before AED withdrawal, and therapeutic monitoring of serum AED levels remain highly variable and are largely based on personal and institutional biases leading to widespread variation and nonuniformity in the patterns of practice. However, despite lack of any quality evidence, patients with brain tumors continue to receive AED prophylaxis across the world with potential for harm and toxicity. Common AED-induced side effects include cognitive impairment, myelosuppression, liver dysfunction, and dermatologic reactions (ranging from minor rashes to life-threatening Stevens–Johnson syndrome), drug interactions with other concomitant medication, apart from the cost and inconvenience., Hence, there is an unmet need for the development of consensus guidelines for the judicious and appropriate usage of AEDs in neuro-oncologic practice.
The aim of our study was to review the current practices of prescribing AEDs in patients diagnosed with brain tumors (primary or metastatic) among health-care professionals and subsequently facilitate the development of appropriate research questions and/or consensus guidelines for their usage in contemporary neuro-oncologic practice.
| Materials and Methods|| |
We sent an e-mail to members of major national societies, i.e., Indian Society of Neuro-Oncology (ISNO), Neurological Society of India (NSI), and Association of Radiation Oncologists of India (AROI) representing the Indian Neuro-Oncology Community in the 1st week of January 2018 with link to a 15-item questionnaire [Online Supplementary File S1][Additional file 1] on SurveyMonkey, an online survey tool. Respondents could complete the questionnaire online through the link that was active till February 28, 2018. The survey questionnaire was divided into two parts: the first part comprising three general questions asking respondents about their specialty, practice setting, and years of experience in managing patients with brain tumors. The second part comprising 12 specific questions was largely structured around existing controversies regarding AED usage in patients with brain tumors that had not been adequately addressed by high-quality evidence-based medicine. Participants were asked about their usage or nonusage of AEDs in the peri- and post-operative period in patients with brain tumors with and without prior history of seizures. Survey questions focused on the frequency, duration, choice of AED, tapering schedule, and necessity of therapeutic drug monitoring. Tumor-related factors that could influence epileptogenicity such as tumor type, grade, and anatomic location were also queried. Finally, respondents were asked whether they believed that prophylactic AEDs reduced the risk of seizures in patients with brain tumors and whether a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) could inform clinical practice regarding AED prophylaxis in neuro-oncology. Responses were analyzed descriptively as well as quantitatively wherever appropriate. Respondents were de-identified to maintain anonymity. Owing to the nature of the study, with no potential for harm whatsoever, our institutional review board which functions in accordance with the Principles of Helsinki provided exemption from ethical review for the conduct of the study.
| Results|| |
An e-mail requesting the recipient's informed response with the link to the questionnaire-based survey was sent out to 3320 health-care professionals affiliated to one of the three major national societies (ISNO, NSI, and AROI) primarily responsible for the management of patients with brain tumors. The survey was completed by 318 respondents for an overall response rate of 9.6%, with every single respondent answering all 15 questions.
Survey sample description
Among the 318 respondents, who participated in the survey, majority (n = 219, 68.9%) were radiation oncologists followed neurosurgeons (n = 73, 22.9%) with remaining 26 (8.2%) being medical oncologists or neurologists [Figure 1]. The predominant practice setting of the respondents spanned the entire health-care spectrum including academic/teaching hospitals (n = 152, 47.8%); private/corporate hospitals (n = 109, 34.3%); individual private practice (n = 26, 8.2%); trust-aided/charitable hospitals (n = 22, 6.9%); and nonteaching government hospitals (n = 9, 2.8%). Over 75% of the respondents had over 5-year experience in managing patients with brain tumors, with nearly 50% reporting over 10-year experience.
Specific responses to anti-epileptic drug-usage
Even for seizure-naïve patients (never experienced seizures in the past), 207 of 318 (65.1%) respondents routinely (always, almost always, and mostly) prescribed prophylactic AEDs in the peri-/post-operative period [Figure 2]. Only 50 (15.7%) respondents never prescribed prophylactic AEDs, while 42 (13.2%) respondents rarely prescribed prophylactic AEDs in this setting [Figure 2]. Nineteen (6%) respondents stated that this question was not applicable. The duration of such AED prophylaxis was quite variable [Figure 3], with nearly half of the respondents prescribing prophylactic AEDs in patients without any history of seizures for at least 6 months or more including 15% for ≥2 years. In patients with prior history of seizures, 98% of respondents routinely prescribed AEDs in the perioperative setting and continued them postoperatively as expected. Only 2% of respondents reported to rarely or never prescribing AEDs in the peri-/post-operative setting even for patients with prior history of seizures. The preferred duration of AED prophylaxis in this setting was longer as expected; nearly 75% of respondents recommended AEDs for at least 2 years from last seizure episode (2-year seizure-free interval), including 15% offering life-long prophylaxis. Only 6% of respondents prescribed AEDs for a short duration (perioperatively up to 4 weeks) in patients with prior history of seizures.
|Figure 2: General frequency of prescribing prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in brain tumor patients without prior history of seizures. Note that over 65% of respondents routinely (always, almost always, mostly) prescribe prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in the peri-/post-operative period even in seizure-naïve patients|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Pie chart demonstrating widespread variability in the duration of anti-epileptic drug prophylaxis in seizure-naïve brain tumor patients|
Click here to view
Levetiracetam emerged as the most preferred AED in the survey, with 60% of respondents recommending it in first-line therapy followed by phenytoin (35%) with the remaining 5% comprising of other drugs such as valproate, carbamazepine, and phenobarbitone. Nearly 55% of respondents generally (always, almost always, and mostly) prescribed AEDs based on the type of seizures (generalized tonic–clonic, complex partial, absence, or focal seizures), whereas 43% of respondents did not base their choice of AEDs on seizure type. Nearly 31% of respondents always tapered AEDs before stopping, whereas 11% of respondents never used a tapering schedule for AED withdrawal. About 6% of respondents stated that tapering of AEDs was not applicable. Therapeutic drug monitoring of AED levels was rarely used in clinical practice with < 8% of respondents checking serum levels regularly and 10.5% only when clinically indicated. Most respondents reported that tumor type, histological grade, and anatomic location of tumor influenced the risk of seizures. Respondents reported glioblastoma (47.2%) and brain metastases (46.2%) to be associated with the highest risk of seizures followed by oligodendroglioma (39.6%), astrocytoma (34.9%), and meningioma (14.8%). Embryonal tumors were associated with the lowest risk of seizures (4.4%). Respondents also reported that tumors located in the parietal (66.7%) and frontal lobe (63.8%) were likely to be associated with the highest risk of seizures, while tumors in the posterior fossa (4.4%) and pineal region (1.9%) were likely to be associated with the lowest risk of seizures [Figure 4]. Unfortunately, temporal lobe location (the common cause of seizures) was inadvertently missing an option in the final electronic version of that particular question, although it was listed in our original draft questionnaire. Despite widespread use in clinical practice, only 27.3% of the respondents strongly believed that prophylactic AEDs significantly reduced the risk of seizures, while 21.3% of respondents completely disagreed with the statement. Over 93% of respondents agreed that a large RCT could potentially (yes, probably, and possibly) inform therapeutic decision-making and shape clinical practice regarding AED prophylaxis in neuro-oncology [Figure 5].
|Figure 4: Bar diagram showing perceived relative risk of seizures as reported by respondents based on the anatomic tumor location|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Pie chart showing general agreement (yes, probably, possibly) in the vast majority of respondents to the statement that a large randomized controlled trial could shape clinical practice regarding antiepileptic drug prophylaxis in neuro-oncology|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
This practice survey of major representatives of the Indian Neuro-Oncology Community clearly demonstrates prevalent widespread variability regarding AED usage including significant gaps in knowledge and practice. Despite the lack of high-quality evidence regarding AED prophylaxis in brain tumor patients without any prior history of seizures, nearly two-thirds of the respondents continue to prescribe prophylactic anticonvulsants routinely in the peri-/post-operative period. Only about one-quarter of the respondents strongly believed that prophylactic AEDs reduced the risk of seizures significantly in patients without any prior seizure episode, yet nearly two-thirds of the respondents prescribed prophylactic AEDs in that setting. The duration of such prophylaxis was also somewhat variable with just under 50% of the respondents prescribing AEDs for 6 months or more. There was the general consensus regarding AED usage in patients with prior history of seizures with a whopping majority (98%) of respondents prescribing them in the peri-/post-operative period. The suggested duration of AED usage in patients with prior seizure history was also longer, with 75% respondents recommending a 2-year seizure-free interval before attempting AED withdrawal. Levetiracetam emerged as preferred first-line AED for primary and secondary prophylaxis in patients with brain tumors regardless of the type of seizure in accordance with accumulating data suggesting its improved therapeutic ratio (at least equivalent if not superior efficacy as well as favorable toxicity profile) compared to phenytoin., A systematic review of 21 studies, albeit with a high risk of bias, reporting seizure frequency data regarding levetiracetam use either as monotherapy or add-on agent in patients with brain tumors showed that levetiracetam was effective in reducing seizure frequency and was associated with favorable safety outcomes.
It is widely accepted that seizures in patients with brain tumors can increase health-care costs, impair their quality of life, and even negatively impact on survival. Immediate postoperative seizures (within the first 2 weeks of surgery) have been associated with either prolongation of hospital length of stay or unplanned/emergency readmissions. Hence, prophylactic AEDs are commonly administered in the perioperative period to reduce the risk of such postoperative complications, although their efficacy in patients without a seizure history has always been disputed. Several nonrandomized studies have demonstrated a benefit to this practice, resulting in very low rates (<2.5%) of early postoperative seizures. However, this putative benefit of AED prophylaxis has never been proven by prospective clinical trials,,, systematic reviews and meta-analyses,,,, including the most recently updated Cochrane review, all of whom have shown no significant reduction in the risk of seizures with such peri- /post-operative AED prophylaxis in seizure-naïve patients with brain tumors. Separate systematic reviews in brain metastases and meningiomas have also failed to demonstrate significant reduction in seizure risk with prophylactic AEDs. In the largest retrospective multi-center study on the patterns of practice, Youngerman et al. analyzed 5985 patients undergoing resection or biopsy for an intracranial neoplasm between 2009 and 2013. They reported the use of prophylactic AEDs in 1671 of 4110 (40.7%) seizure-naïve patients with levetiracetam as the most preferred agent (72%). On multivariable analysis, anatomic location, tumor pathology, and geographic region of neurosurgery were significantly associated with AED prophylaxis.
In the year 2000, a Position Statement by the American Academy of Neurology recommended against the routine use of prophylactic AEDs in seizure-naïve patients, citing lack of any demonstrable clinical benefit. However, AED prophylaxis still continues to be used widely across the world despite guidelines from the premier neurology society. Since then, five practice surveys,,,, addressing this issue have been published, which show very variable prevalence (25%–70%) of AED prophylaxis in this setting [Table 1]. The physician-reported practice of AED prophylaxis and actual anticonvulsant use has moderately declined since the publication of the position statement. Our survey, though, suggests relative high frequency (65%) of prescribing prophylactic AEDs similar to many prior surveys with levetiracetam emerging as the most preferred agent. The vast majority of respondents agreed that a large RCT on this question would shape clinical practice by generating high-quality evidence to support or refute the usage of prophylactic AEDs. However, such an RCT is easier said than done. Assuming a 10% baseline expected incidence of perioperative seizures, one would require over 1250 patients (625 patients in each arm) to be enrolled in an RCT to demonstrate an absolute seizure reduction of 5% (relative risk reduction of 50%) with 80% power using a non-inferiority design at the 0.05 significance level. This number would increase to 1500 patients if the baseline risk of perioperative seizures was assumed to be 6%, keeping all other parameters same. Given the time-frame, logistics, and significant resource implications including cost considerations, such a trial may not be practical and merits further nuanced consideration and debate. Researchers at the Duke University are presently enrolling patients on a single-center three-arm, open-label, randomized Phase II trial of perioperative seizure prophylaxis using lacosamide or levetiracetam (test arms) versus no AED (control arm) in suspected glioma patients undergoing craniotomy using visits to the emergency/hospital re-admission within 30-day of surgery as the primary endpoint with a target accrual of 232 patients over 2-year period. However, the choice of primary endpoint in this study is inappropriate and likely to be influenced by other causes or perioperative morbidity (wound complications including infections and thromboembolic events) and the sample size inadequate and grossly underpowered to detect any meaningful difference.
|Table 1: Surveys of health-care professionals regarding patterns of practice of antiepileptic drug prophylaxis in patients with|
Click here to view
Strengths and limitations
The biggest strength of our survey lies in the fact that it was not restricted to any particular specialty but represents the opinion and practice of the major stakeholders of the neuro-oncology community of the country (ISNO, NSI, and AROI). Over 300 members responded to our questionnaire-based survey making it one of the largest such surveys on AED prophylaxis in neuro-oncology. However, several caveats and limitations inherent to such online practice surveys remain. Less than 10% of the recipients actually responded to our questionnaire-based survey; hence, it may be inappropriate to assume that this represents the majority view of members of the three academic societies who were polled. Second, we did not attempt to analyze the difference in the responses, if any, based on the specialty, years of experience, or practice setting of the respondents. The number of neurologists among the respondents was miniscule and clearly under-represented. It is possible that the survey results could have been quite different if many more neurologists (specialists who deal and prescribe AEDs to patients with seizures including brain tumors) would have responded. The survey lacked specific questions regarding the choice of AED given their potential interaction with chemotherapeutic agents and corticosteroids. Finally, emerging data suggest a significant albeit small survival benefit with the use of prophylactic AEDs (mostly valproate) in malignant gliomas;, questions regarding such perceived benefit were not included in our survey precluding any such analysis.
| Conclusionsu|| |
Our practice survey of the Indian Neuro-Oncology Community demonstrates widespread variability in the frequency and duration of AED prophylaxis in seizure-naive brain tumor patients in contemporary practice. Most respondents believe that tumor type, histological grade, and anatomic tumor location influence epileptogenicity and that levetiracetam should be the drug of the first choice for AED prophylaxis. Given the current lack of high-quality evidence, universal acceptance of consensus guidelines or position statement is unlikely until a large RCT on this topic informs therapeutic decision-making in the future.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| Supplementary File|| |
Supplementary File S1: Anti-Epileptic Drugs in Neuro-Oncology Practice Survey
Principal Investigator: XXXX
Research Team: YYYY
Part A: General Information
- What is your practice specialty?
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Oncology
- Others, specify _____________
- What is your practice setting? (In case of multiple practice settings, please tick on the predominant setting defined as consuming >50% of total practice time)
- Academic (Teaching) Hospital
- Nonteaching Government Hospital
- Trust-aided/Charitable Hospital
- Corporate Hospital
- Private (Individual) Practice
- Others (please specify ___________________________)
- What is your experience in treating patients with brain tumors?
- <1 year
- 1–5 years
- 5–10 years
- 10–15 years
- >15 years
- Others (please specify____________________________)
Part B: Antiepileptic Drug usage specific
- Do you prescribe prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in the peri-/postoperative setting in patients with brain tumors who have never experienced any seizure?
- Almost always
- Not Applicable
How long do you give prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in the postoperative period for patients with brain tumors without any seizure? (answer to the closest duration)
- <7 days
- 1–4 weeks
- >4 weeks but < 6 months
- ≥6 months but < 2 years
- ≥2 years
- Not Applicable
- Do you prescribe antiepileptic drugs in the postoperative period for patients with brain tumors who have experienced seizures previously?
- Almost always
- Not Applicable
How long do you prescribe antiepileptic drugs in the postoperative period for patients with brain tumor who have experienced seizures previously? (answer to the closest duration)
- <4 weeks
- 4 weeks–6 months
- >6 months but < 2 years
- ≥2 years
- 2 years from last seizure (2-year seizure-free interval)
- Which of the following is your first-line antiepileptic drug of choice in patients with brain tumors?
- Others (please specify _________________________)
- Is your choice of antiepileptic drug influenced by the type of seizure? (generalized seizures, complex partial seizures, absence seizures, and focal seizures)
- Almost always
- Not Applicable
- Do you taper antiepileptic drugs before stopping?
- Almost always
- Not applicable
How frequently do you test therapeutic levels of antiepileptic drugs in patients with brain tumors?
- Only if needed
- Not applicable
- According to you, which brain tumor type carries a high risk of seizures? (You can select more than one option)
- Embryonal tumor
- Others (please specify____________________________)
- According to you, which tumor location carries a high risk of seizures?
(You can select more than one option)
- Frontal lobe
- Parietal lobe
- Occipital lobe
- Pineal region
- Posterior fossa
- Others (please specify_____________________________)
Do you strongly believe that prophylactic antiepileptic drugs reduce the risk of seizures?
- Do you think that a large randomized controlled trial can shape clinical practice regarding antiepileptic drug prophylaxis in neuro-oncology?
- Not sure
| References|| |
Maschio M. Brain tumor-related epilepsy. Curr Neuropharmacol 2012;10:124-33.
Gallagher P, Leach JP, Grant R. Time to focus on brain tumor-related epilepsy trials. Neurooncol Pract 2014;1:123-33.
Vecht C, Royer-Perron L, Houillier C, Huberfeld G. Seizures and anticonvulsants in brain tumours: Frequency, mechanisms and anti-epileptic management. Curr Pharm Des 2017;23:6464-87.
Koekkoek JA, Dirven L, Reijneveld JC, Postma TJ, Grant R, Pace A, et al
. Epilepsy in the end of life phase of brain tumor patients: A systematic review. Neurooncol Pract 2014;1:134-40.
Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Forsyth PA, Recht LD, Wen PY, Chamberlain MC, et al.
Practice parameter: Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2000;54:1886-93.
Perucca P, Gilliam FG. Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:792-802.
de Kinderen RJ, Evers SM, Rinkens R, Postulart D, Vader CI, Majoie MH, et al.
Side-effects of antiepileptic drugs: The economic burden. Seizure 2014;23:184-90.
Iuchi T, Kuwabara K, Matsumoto M, Kawasaki K, Hasegawa Y, Sakaida T. Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis during and early after craniotomy for brain tumours: A phase II prospective, randomised study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86:1158-62.
Lee CH, Koo HW, Han SR, Choi CY, Sohn MJ, Lee CH. Phenytoin versus levetiracetam as prophylaxis for postcraniotomy seizure in patients with no history of seizures: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2019. [In press].
Nasr ZG, Paravattil B, Wilby KJ. Levetiracetam for seizure prevention in brain tumor patients: A systematic review. J Neurooncol 2016;129:1-3.
Dewan MC, White-Dzuro GA, Brinson PR, Thompson RC, Chambless LB. Perioperative seizure in patients with glioma is associated with longer hospitalization, higher readmission, and decreased overall survival. J Neurosurg 2016;125:1033-41.
Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Friedberg MH, Lathi E, Choi H, Furie K, et al
. A randomized blinded placebo-controlled trial of divalproex sodium prophylaxis in adults with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Neurology 1996;54:1886-93.
Zachenhofer I, Donat M, Oberndorfer S, Roessler K. Perioperative levetiracetam for prevention of seizures in supratentorial brain tumor surgery. J Neurooncol 2011;101:101-6.
Wu AS, Trinh VT, Suki D, Graham S, Forman A, Weinberg JS, et al.
Aprospective randomized trial of perioperative seizure prophylaxis in patients with intraparenchymal brain tumors. J Neurosurg 2013;118:873-83.
Perry J, Zinman L, Chambers A, Spithoff K, Lloyd N, Laperriere N, et al.
The use of prophylactic anticonvulsants in patients with brain tumours-a systematic review. Curr Oncol 2006;13:222-9.
Kong X, Guan J, Yang Y, Li Y, Ma W, Wang R. Ameta-analysis: Do prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in patients with brain tumors decrease the incidence of seizures? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015;134:98-103.
Chandra V, Rock AK, Opalak C, Stary JM, Sima AP, Carr M, et al.
Asystematic review of perioperative seizure prophylaxis during brain tumor resection: The case for a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 2017;43:E18.
Joiner EF, Youngerman BE, Hudson TS, Yang J, Welch MR, McKhann GM, et al.
Effectiveness of perioperative antiepileptic drug prophylaxis for early and late seizures following oncologic neurosurgery: A meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2019. [In press].
Lobos-Urbina D, Kittsteiner-Manubens L, Peña J. Is primary prevention with antiepileptic drugs effective in brain tumors or brain metastases? Medwave 2017;17:e6871.
Greenhalgh J, Weston J, Dundar Y, Nevitt SJ, Marson AG. Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for postcraniotomy seizures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;5:CD007286.
Mikkelsen T, Paleologos NA, Robinson PD, Ammirati M, Andrews DW, Asher AL, et al.
The role of prophylactic anticonvulsants in the management of brain metastases: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 2010;96:97-102.
Islim AI, McKeever S, Kusu-Orkar TE, Jenkinson MD. The role of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs for seizure prophylaxis in meningioma surgery: A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci 2017;43:47-53.
Brouwers MC, Chambers A, Perry J; Neuro-oncology Disease Site Group. Can surveying practitioners about their practices help identify priority clinical practice guideline topics? BMC Health Serv Res 2003;3:23.
Siomin V, Angelov L, Li L, Vogelbaum MA. Results of a survey of neurosurgical practice patterns regarding the prophylactic use of anti-epilepsy drugs in patients with brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2005;74:211-5.
Tsimiklis CA, Harding MA. Brain tumors and prophylactic antiepileptic drug prescribing patterns by neurosurgeons practising in Australasia. Neurosci Med 2015;6:13-9.
Dewan MC, Thompson RC, Kalkanis SN, Barker FG 2nd
, Hadjipanayis CG. Prophylactic antiepileptic drug administration following brain tumor resection: Results of a recent AANS/CNS section on tumors survey. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1772-8.
Giraldi D, Chavredakis E, Zakaria R, Brodbelt A, Jenkinson MD. Prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in meningioma surgery – Survey of clinical practice in the UK. Neurooncol 2018;20 Suppl 1:i11.
Ali A, Zoccoli C, Kim L, Brown T, Glantz M. Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with brain tumors: does it prevent first seizures, does it prolong survival, and do we believe the data? Neurooncol 2017;19 Suppl 6:vi136.
Benit CP, Vecht CJ. Seizures and cancer: Drug interactions of anticonvulsants with chemotherapeutic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and glucocorticoids. Neurooncol Pract 2016;3:245-60.
Brown TJ, Zoccoli CM, Ali A, Kim LJ, Glantz MJ. Association of anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors and 1-year overall survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:2043.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]